Data Watch: US Natural Gas Monthly Production October 2013 Plus a Review of EIA’s Medium- and Long-Term Forecasts

Apologies for the late reporting of this number; my brain has been occupied with job-eating robots and computers for the last few weeks (and another post on this theme to come).

Apart from getting the latest monthly US natural gas number, I also want to do a quick catch up on The Energy Information Administration (EIA)’s “Annual Energy Outlook 2014″, which came out in mid-December and the “Short Term Energy Outlook” that came out on January 7th with new 2015 numbers.

But first the monthly number: the US government agency the EIA issues data on U.S. natural gas production, including shale gas, on a monthly basis with a lag of roughly two months. The latest data release was made on January 7th, and covers the period up until end-October 2013.

Data is reported in billion cubic feet (bcf). Key points:

  • October 2013 natural gas dry production: 2,007 bcf, plus 0.6% year-on-year
  • Average monthly production for the 12 months to October 2013: 2,015 bcf, +0.7% over the same period the previous year

Since the end of 2011, production growth has stalled (click chart below for larger image), with the year-on-year 12-month average now flat-lining.

US Dry Gas Production Oct 2013 jpeg

Natural gas well-head prices exhibit seasonality, with winters generally seeing stronger prices due to heating needs. The recent polar-vortex induced cold snap in the U.S. has also been supporting prices over recent weeks (here, click for larger image).

US Nat Gas Spot Prices Jan 14 jpeg

To put the current price of $4.5 per million Btu in perspective, a longer term monthly time series going up until end December 2012 is given below (click for larger image).

US Nat Gas Well Head LT jpeg

Looking at the two charts together, it is easy to observe some trends rarely pointed out by the mainstream media. First, up until 2000, natural gas prices had been flatlining around $2 per million Btu for a couple of decades. Accordingly, at the current price of $4 to $4.5, we are at a level double a little over a decade ago in nominal non-inflation-adjusted terms and over 50% in real inflation-adjusted terms. Shale gas has not given the U.S. an abundant supply of cheap gas, it has just given the country less expensive gas than otherwise (although certainly less expensive that in Europe or Japan).

Second, many media reports cherry pick the two $10 plus spikes as the comparison points when looking at today’s price. However, natural gas has a very inelastic short-term supply curve and has always shown short-term volatility. Taking a 12-month moving average gives a better idea of the underlying economic attractiveness of natural gas for investors—and the smoothed price averaged around $6 over the mid-2000s. Putting these facts together, we can say that shale gas production forced natural gas prices down a lot from their mid-2000 smoothed peaks but it has in no way restored the cheap gas status quo that existed prior to 2000. In short, we are not living in a brave new world of abundant natural gas—price tells us that.

The EIA also sees little change in price or volume of production going forward. The agency’s latest “Short-Term Energy Outlook” (STEO) was issued on January 7th and contains new forecasts going out until end 2015. According to their numbers, the Henry Hub price is to remain flat for the next two years at around $4, while production will increase 2.1% in 2014 and 1.3% in 2015 (click for larger images for the charts below).

STEO Jan 14 Nat Gas Price jpeg

STEO Jan 14 Nat Gas Prod jpeg

For a longer term perspective, we can refer to the early release of the Annual Energy Outlook 2014, which was published on 16 December 2013. This shows a production take-off in 2016 to give a second leg to the shale gas story:

Nat Gas Prod to 2040 jpeg

Some of the new production is going to replace imports and some will be directed toward exports (both by pipeline to Mexico and by LNG carrier to further afield):

US Nat Gas Import Export 2014 jpeg

Indeed, the January 2014 STEO has this to say about LNG:

LNG imports have declined over the past several years because higher prices in Europe and Asia are more attractive to sellers than the relatively low prices in the United States. Several companies are planning to build liquefaction capacity to export LNG from the United States. The first of the new facilities to liquefy gas produced in the lower-48 states for export is expected to partially come online in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Growing domestic production over the past several years has replaced pipeline imports from Canada, while exports to Mexico have increased. EIA expects these trends will continue through 2015. EIA projects net imports of 3.0 Bcf/d in 2014 and 2.5 Bcf/d in 2015, which would be the lowest level since 1986. Over the longer term, the EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2014 projects the United States will be a net exporter of natural gas beginning in 2018.

With rig count not telling us much about anything anymore (see, for example, here), it is exceptionally difficult to verify whether production will pick up speed again from 2016 as per the EIA viewpoint. That said, statements out of Peter Voser, the departing head of Shell, hardly suggest that the industry is all fired up and ready to take production up to the next level; for example, read  these excerpts from The Financial Times:

“Unconventionals did not exactly play out as planned,” Mr Voser said.


Just last month, Shell said it had put its acreage in the Eagle Ford shale in Texas up for sale, as part of a strategic review of its US shale portfolio.

Mr Voser said Shell’s Upstream Americas business was in the red because of a “strategic decision to slow down” on shale in the face of low gas prices. “Therefore you are hit with more than $3bn of depreciation whilst you don’t have the revenues against it,” he said.

He also acknowledged that exploration results in the US shales had been disappointing. “We expected higher flow rates and therefore more scalability for a company like Shell,” he said.

I have blogged extensively on the overblown claims for shale gas previously (hereherehere and here), with even President Obama amplifying the hype, and am fascinated as how this story will play out over the next 24 months. 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s